Quantcast Harbus
College Media Network

Harbus

RSSLoginBack Issues

A Tibetan Point-of-View

Tenzing Tekan Lama (NH), Contributing Writer

Issue date: 1/20/09 Section: News
  • Print
  • Email
  • Page 1 of 1

I was surprised and disappointed to find out that HBS, shifting responsibility by citing International Olympic Committee criteria, would not allow me to put up the Tibetan flag as part of the section flag raising ceremony or even host a Tibetan table at the International Food festival. These restrictions are fundamentally inconsistent with the core mission of institutions of learning, particularly for one whose motto is Veritas (Latin for truth) and whose Community Values exhort respect for "free expression and inquiry, and a commitment to truth."

An objective analysis of the long history of Tibet as an independent nation until 1951 and its unique historical, cultural, and geographic characteristics would convince most people that Tibet's claim to self-government is as strong, if not stronger, than many of the countries in the United Nations. The fact that most Tibetans do not accept Chinese rule was very clear last March, when tens of thousands of initially peaceful Tibetan demonstrators were violently repressed by the Chinese government. The Dalai Lama, the spiritual and political leader of Tibetans, has offered for decades to engage the Chinese leadership through dialogue and compromise, even sacrificing the goal of Tibetan independence and seeking only genuine autonomy within China.

Unfortunately, the Chinese government believes violence and censorship is the best way to deal with differences of opinion, including on the Tibetan issue. This is why I find it particularly unfortunate to think that HBS can be added to the too-long list of institutions unwilling to risk offending an increasingly powerful and belligerent China, even when the offense is taken against the exercise of fundamentally important values such as free speech here in the United States. When HBS itself, cushioned by its position as one of the leading educational institutions in the world, shirks from its responsibility of upholding free speech, its appeal to students to act on our principles in the corporate world rings a little hollow.

 I sincerely hope that the students and administration of HBS reconsider the restrictions on the right of students to choose the flags that represent their national identities. The opportunity to truly demonstrate respect for our fellow students and listen to diverse points of view is a precious one, particularly for those of us who are not used to hearing dissenting narratives.  In my section, section H, we have decided not to hang national flags in recognition that one student - me - would be unable to participate. I was truly moved and impressed by the enlightened comments of my section mates during our discussion. Our section has come out much stronger and richer, a step toward broadening our understanding, in the true spirit for which HBS and Harvard University stand.
Page 1 of 1

Article Tools

Viewing Comments 1 - 10 of 17

lynie

posted 1/20/09 @ 1:30 PM EST

A Chinese point-of-view

First, the uniqueness in historical, cultural, and geographic characteristics doesn't mean Tibet is or should be an independent nation. (Continued…)

(5 replies)   Details   Reply to this comment

L.P

posted 1/20/09 @ 9:15 PM EST

From "The case for Independent Tibet":

"Trade with China is in fact the overarching reason why Britain and the United States have in the last two centuries refused to support, even acknowledge, the fact of an independent Tibet. (Continued…)

chinese

posted 1/21/09 @ 8:06 AM EST

It is ridiculous to self-claim this piece of junk as "an objective view". As Chinese, we resolutely stand by our government to crush any brazen and unrealistic "autonomy" request from those india-born fake tibetans. (Continued…)

Tenzin Boepa

posted 1/21/09 @ 1:52 PM EST

Here is something I read in a book by a Tibetan Communist, who still lives in China. May be this has a lesson for those involved in the present controversy. (Continued…)

lynie

posted 1/21/09 @ 2:29 PM EST

[quote]For the "chinese supporter"[/quote]

Besides "brainwash" what else you can say? Every time we say something different then we are labeled "brainwashed". (Continued…)

palden

posted 1/21/09 @ 5:39 PM EST

well, since absolute separate cultural expression proves separate historical reality of nations, tibet is no exception. tibet was independent, which is not far away thing, it is just 50 years ago. (Continued…)

gord

posted 1/21/09 @ 9:22 PM EST

"moreover, tibetans never accepted chinese overlordship and defied through any means"
- I think you are talking about yourself, and those Indian-born Tibetans. (Continued…)

gord

posted 1/21/09 @ 10:47 PM EST

"it is pretty interesting to see how the chinese students start shaking to their bones whenever there is the mention of tibet."
- That is indeed a quite acute observation. (Continued…)

Tenzin Boepa

posted 1/22/09 @ 2:43 PM EST

gord puts the spotlight right on the challenge to resolving the Tibetan problem. While the people posting on this site may or may not be representative of the Chinese public (as also the Tibetan public), I do not reach the same conclusion as you about the strategy. (Continued…)

lynie

posted 1/22/09 @ 5:04 PM EST

"If indeed the Chinese people cannot understand the Tibetan sentiments and continue to treat the Tibetans as outsiders..."

You are wrong! Chinese people do NOT treat Tibetans as outsiders. (Continued…)

Post a Comment

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

Advertisement

FRONT PAGE

Download Print Edition PDF

Poll

When you travel, do you go...
Submit Vote

View Results


Advertisement